Google car views
Four directional Street View images at 2,758 road-centre sample points form the traditional GVI baseline.
Pedestrian-level street greenery · City of London
Traditional GVI sees London from a Google Street View car. We move the camera onto the sidewalk—and test which measure better reflects the greenery pedestrians actually experience.
Google Street View is usually captured from a vehicle in the road. Its Green View Index is therefore a car-level measure – affected by road width, parked vehicles and distance from sidewalk planting.
Traditional GVI observes the city from the road centre. PGVI moves the camera to the sidewalk, where planting, parked vehicles, road width and pedestrian-only space enter the frame differently.
The workflow compares vehicle-based GVI with sidewalk-based PGVI, adds citywide spatial visibility, and validates all three against volunteers’ lived perception.
Four directional Street View images at 2,758 road-centre sample points form the traditional GVI baseline.
Pedestrian-level images capture sidewalk planting, cycle paths, pedestrian streets and narrow alleys.
The same typologies are read from both the vehicle lane and the sidewalk.
3D tree attributes and building geometry become a planar visibility field.
Seven streetscape indicators ground the computational outputs in perception.
The City of London boundary comes from the Greater London Authority’s official GIS service. Inside it, the study’s 50-metre sample points each represent four Google Street View directions; colour encodes vehicle-based GVI.
Select a type to compare the actual Google car view with the pedestrian sidewalk view, then read the GVI-PGVI gap alongside spatial visibility and human ratings.
A useful baseline: geometry remains visible, while almost no green enters the pedestrian frame.
Bars are normalized within each metric across the nine sampled typologies. Values retain the published units.
Through collaboration with Mapillary, the study could capture sidewalk greenery, pedestrian-only streets, cycle paths and narrow alleys that conventional car-based imagery often misses.
Vehicle-level Google Street View and sidewalk-level Mapillary imagery do not frame the same greenery. The published segmentation table exposes the mismatch across all nine types.
Mapillary-based PGVI showed the strongest relationship with perceived green visibility. Traditional car-based GVI can underestimate greenery when the vehicle camera is distant from or obstructed from sidewalk planting.
Correlation with volunteer ratings of perceived green visibility. A higher value means the computational measure more closely follows what participants reported.
Green is noticed more when the street also feels secure.
Clear sightlines reinforce the visibility and legibility of greenery.
A pedestrian-friendly street makes green experience easier to reach.
Explore the full published correlation matrix. Hover or focus a cell to read the variables and coefficient.
Car-based imagery remains scalable, but any claim about pedestrian experience should be checked from the pedestrian’s actual position.
Trees combined with shrubs or grass, especially on both sides of a street, produce stronger pedestrian visibility.
Safety, visual transparency and walkability shape whether visible greenery becomes a positive human experience.